Over the years, I've told colleagues and friends about things I have seen or experienced. Many times, people have said that I should write them down so that they won't be lost and forgotten, since some of them might be useful parts of our history. I've been writing them down, without being sure what I would do with them. I decided to gradually post them on this website, and see what reactions I get. I suggest reading from the bottom up (starting with the August 2017 post "The Meritocracy"). Thoughtful and kind feedback would be useful for me, and would help me to revise the exposition to make it as useful as possible. I hope that while you read my stories you will ask yourself "What can I learn from this?" I'm particularly interested in knowing what you see as the point of the story, or what you take away from it. Please send feedback to asilverb@gmail.com. Thanks for taking the time to read and hopefully reflect on them!

I often run the stories past the people I mention, even when they are anonymized, to get their feedback and give them a chance to correct the record or ask for changes. When they tell me they're happy to be named, I sometimes do so. When I give letters as pseudonyms, there is no correlation between those letters and the names of the real people.

Saturday, July 12, 2025

"Proposition whatever-it-is"

This post is the ninth post in a series of stories that, taken together, might help explain why I decided to take early retirement from UCI. My point in posting these stories is to say "This happened. It shouldn't have. Can you learn something from it, so you can prevent such things from happening where you are (or at least not be complicit)?"

"Proposition whatever-it-is"

The math department Chair informed the faculty that the Mad Hatter Dean was coming to a faculty meeting to give us a "speech about the importance of inclusive excellence and diversity in faculty recruitment".

At the meeting, the Dean told us that the important words in the message he's getting "from above" are "inclusive excellence," "preferably URM [underrepresented minority]".

He told us that there's an "inclusive excellence supplement" that for each advertised job can give an extra position, and URM is more important than female. He let us know that there's a 100% chance of getting an extra position if the department proposes two URM candidates for the position, and 90% if one is URM and the second is female. He was not sure what would happen if one were female and neither were URM, but he thought that probably wouldn't qualify for an extra position.

He said that the pressure from "across campus, Janet Napolitano [then-President of the University of California], and the legislature is unprecedented".

He ended with "That's all I know how to say legally." He told us he came with written notes (which he held in his hand), to make sure he didn't misspeak.

I asked why what he had already told us was legal. He said he didn't know.

After questions from others, the Dean said that "`officially' the position is wide open and there are no strings attached. There is no discrimination." He said it with a smirk that made it clear that he didn't believe that at all.

He said that "the university walks a fine line on Proposition whatever-it-is." (He presumably meant California Proposition 209.)

He added that politically he's generally on the left, and he agrees with some of the university's goals on diversity (making clear by implication that he didn't agree with all of it).

He really should have stuck to his written notes.